3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

You are here

How to be sure a test has actually failed

1 post / 0 new
Sanjay Zalavadia
Sanjay Zalavadia's picture
How to be sure a test has actually failed

Failure isn't an option in many situations, but mistakes and errors can cause complications to arise that can be difficult to recover from. This is why agile testing methodologies have become so integral in software development and release. The involvement of quality assurance personnel from the beginning of a project ensures that testing can begin right away, enabling teams to build a better quality product.

However, can you really count on your tests to be correct every time? Tests are only as good as their programmers, and human flaws can throw a wrench into testing efforts. Teams must be confident that their tests are performing correctly in order to keep progressing. Let's take a look at a few tips that will help you be sure that a test has actually failed and create steps to improve operations.

Gain guidance prior to test runs

Insight will be a major factor in maintaining and improving your test cases. The only way to get this is to have a clear view of the requirements and how developers are working to deliver on these needs. QA teams can also glean a lot of information once their tests are run, but the initial legwork can help ensure that tests are performing correctly from the very beginning. TechBeacon contributor Christine Parizo noted that turning failures into test cases for future releases will help create a stronger test base and ensure that scripts are finding all possible errors. In addition, working alongside developers can help QA catch omissions and errors faster and create a collaborative environment.

"Over time, getting familiar with the software and with its areas of potential weaknesses — because no software is free of those — builds an additional level of instinct-based, ad hoc testing," QA engineer Olga Nikulina told Parizo.

Beware of false negatives and positives

Organizations must ensure that their tests are regularly evaluated and adjusted to verify that they are working as intended and that they continue to provide value to testing operations. However, it's important for testing teams to be aware of false negative and false positive results. As DevelopSense's Michael Bolton noted, a passing or failing test is not a guarantee that the product is or isn't working correctly. It's very easy for elements to appear like they're functioning appropriately, but can break down upon release. Take GUI testing, for example. An automation testing tool might pass this type of test because computers solely evaluate code integrity, not aesthetics. But there could be glaring errors only visible when the program meets a real user. Bolton explained that passed tests simply signify use specific inputs based on a few requirements, meaning that any slight changes could easily put it into the failing category.

At the same time, a failure is not always conclusive when it comes to testing. Misunderstanding a requirement or misconfiguring the test platform can easily result in a failed test, even if nothing is actually wrong with it. Teams must take a deep dive into the causes of failed tests to ensure that the result was accurate and wasn't caused by outside forces.

"The timing of the test may be off, such that system was not ready for the input we provided," Bolton wrote. "There may be an as-yet-not-understood reason why the product is providing a result which seems incorrect to us, but which is in fact correct. A failing test is an allegation of failure."

Use capable tools

One means of ensuring test result accuracy is to keep detailed records through a capable test management tool. This type of asset not only enables team members to collaborate across projects, but they can also actively write, assign, schedule and adjust test cases as needed. With this resource, teams can look at their progress, evaluate whether their testing results are correct and catch bugs early on that can slip through the cracks. Using a variety of software testing metrics, analysis and test data, and organizations can reduce false outcomes, improve overall reliability and produce a quality product.

Rooting out problem test cases can be a challenge, but it's necessary to build confidence in testing efforts. By deriving guidance prior to test executions, leveraging capable tools and understanding how to spot false results, QA teams can have peace of mind that their test outcomes are accurate and can use these conclusions to direct testing efforts in the future.

MANUFACTURERS Wallboard

Testing tool manufacturers world-wide list
10Levels ABID CONSULTING Accord Software ActiMind AdaCore AdaLog
AgileLoad AgileWay Agitar Algorismi ALL4TEC Android
Apache Apica Apollo Systems AppAssist.mobi Applitools AppPerfect
Appsee ApTest Assertible Assure Atlassian AutoIt Consulti ..
Automation Anyw .. Automation Cons .. Aztaz Software Backtrace I/O Badboy BlazeMeter
Borvid BrowserStack BSQUARE BStriker Intern .. CA Technologies Canonical
Canoo Catch Limited CelestialTeapot Celtic Testing .. Chris Mallett Cleanscape
CloudQA CodeCentrix CodePlex projec .. Codoid Cogitek Compuware
Configure IT Conflair ConSol Core Services Countersoft CresTech Softwa ..
Cross Browser T .. Cross Check Crowdsourced Te .. Cucumber Ltd Cyara Cygnet Infotech
DareBoost Databene Datamatics Glob .. DevExpress DTM soft Dynatrace LLC
EasyQA Eclipse EKA TechServ Elvior Emmanuel Jorge Empirix
EPAM Systems Equafy Esterel eXept Software .. Experitest Finaris
Froglogic FrontEndART Ltd GeneXus GitHub project gnoso Google Code Pro ..
GrammaTech Gurock Software Hewlett Packard .. Hexawise High-Tech Bridg .. Hiptest
Hitex IBM Rational imbus Shanghai Impetus Inflectra informUp
INTALIO intechnica Ipswitch JadeLiquid Soft .. Jamo Solutions JANOVA
JAR Technologie .. JBoss Developer jClarity Jellly.io JetBrains Jively
jQuery foundati .. Jspresso Kanoah Software KMS Technology Kualitee LDRA Limited
Litmus LoadFocus Loadster Perfor .. MarathonITE Marketcircle Marketcircle
Maveryx Meliora Ltd Micro Focus Sof .. Microsoft Mobile Labs Mobile1st
Mockaroo, LLC ModalLogic IT Monkop Inc Mozila MSys Technologi .. Navicat
NeoTys NetCart Netvantage Tech .. NMQA NORIZZK.COM Novosync Mobili ..
NRG Global NTT Resonant OC Systems Odin Technology OpCord Oracle
Orcanos Original Softwa .. Ossia Conseil OW2 PANAYA Parasoft
PassMark Patterson Consu .. Perfecto Mobile Pivotal Labs Plutora Polarion
Postman (API To .. PractiTest PrimaTest Process One Programming Res .. Psoda
PureLoad PushToTest Python Q-Assurance QA Systems QACube
QASymphony QMetry Quali QualiTest Qualitia Softwa .. Quality First S ..
Quotium RadView Softwar .. Ranorex RedLine13 Reflective Solu .. ReQtest
RevDeBug Robotium Tech Rogue Wave Soft .. Rommana Softwar .. RTTS ruby-doc.org
Runscope Sandklef GNU La .. Sauce Labs Seapine Softwar .. SeleniumHQ Sencha
Sensiple SmartBear Softw .. SmarteSoft SOASTA SoftLogica Softomotive
Softsmith SolutionSoft Sy .. SonarSource Sourceforge SqashTeam SQS Software Qu ..
Square Stimulus Techno .. Swifting AB Synopsys T-komp T-Plan
TechExcel TechTalk Telerik By Prog .. Tellurium Test Goat Test Recon
TestCaseLab testCloud.de Gm .. Testenium Testim.io Testing Technol .. TestingBot
TestLodge Testmunk TestObject GmbH TestOptimal TestPlant TestPro
Testuff The Core Bankin .. The MathWorks The Open Group thePHP.cc Thoughtbot
Thoughtworks Tigris.org Time Simulator Top-Q Trace Technolog .. TrendIC
TRICENTIS Tritusa Pty Ltd TuniTEAM TWD Solutions P .. TypeMock Tyto Software
Ubertesters UniTESK Universal Test .. Usetrace Ltd Utrecht Univers .. Validata Group
Vanamco AG Vector Software Veracode Verifaya Corpor .. Verit VersionOne
Viewlike.us Vornex Inc. Watir.com WcfStorm Soluti .. We Are Mammoth Web Performance ..
Wikidi Wintask Wireshark Found .. Worksoft Xceptance XebiaLabs
XK72 XQual YesSo YouWave ZAP technologie .. Zeenyx Software ..
Zephyr Zeta Software zutubi pty

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti